Passey et al. (2017) used actual energy consumption data of Sydney households to analyse the extent to which different electricity network demand tariffs charge customers according to the cost of their consumption. Among other things, they illustrate that a demand tariff that charges households’ individual monthly peak demand is less likely to be cost-reflective than one applied during the monthly network peak period.  Picture by Nastya Dulhiier, Unsplash Electricity network

Frederiksen et al (1994) investigated whether, in Pakistan, there was a tradeoff between government spending on defense and other...

Boza et al. (2023) compared the competitiveness of Spain’s and Chile’s olive oil industries using quantitative metrics and Porter’s...

Jovanovic et al (2005) analyzed the impact of two general-purpose technologies (GPTs) on the US economy: electricity and information...

Bardazzi et al (2023) argue that the complex nature of energy poverty prevents it from being captured by a single variable. For this...

Maniatis et al (2023) discuss the rise of energy communities in Greece since they were first introduced by legislation in 2018. The...

In his 1950 paper ‘Vertical Integration and Antitrust Policy’, Spengler posited that vertical mergers could lead to lower consumer...

In a 2001 paper, Robert Pitofsky, former Commissioner of the US Federal Trade Commission, examined the challenges faced by antitrust...

Schmitt (2017) found evidence that multi-market contact in the US hospital industry has led to higher hospital prices. This suggests that...

In their seminal 2010 paper, Farrell and Shapiro introduced a novel metric for the evaluation of unilateral price effects in horizontal...